Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-05-19

WRIT - A No. 6908 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 6908 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 6908 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:83639 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6908 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ghanshyam Jaisawal Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Atipriya Gautam,Madhaw Pandey,Sr. Advocate,Vinod Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. It is a case where services of the petitioner have come to be dispensed with on the ground that thumb impression given during examination of the candidate having been found to be not matching with the biometric impression and the opinion came to be tendered of mismatch. It is a case, therefore, where expert opinion was obtained from the laboratory and the services of the petitioner have been dispensed with on the basis of such opinion but without calling any explanation from the petitioner. This controversy is no more res integra in the light of the judgment of a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Ran Vijay Singh and others vs. Union of India and others; 2018 (6) ADJ 369 affirmed in Special Appeal No.- 1045 of 2018 decided on 8th May, 2019 and further in the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in the case of Vijay Pal and others vs. Union of India and others; Wri

WRIT - A No. 6908 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam