Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-05-16

WRIT - A No. 6703 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 6703 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 6703 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:81041 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6703 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajan Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gulab Kumar Bharatiya,Shailesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Heard Shailesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for a direction for concerned competent respondent no. 3 to decide the claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment. Learned Standing Counsel submits that petitioner may not be entitled for compassionate appointment for thee reason that his mother is already in employment of Central Government at Ordinance Depot, Cheoki. It is further submitted that petitioner has approached this Court after more than a decade as his father had died on 12.04.2011. Upon a pointed query, learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid facts. In view of the above, in my considered view, petitioner is not entitled for compassionate appointment in the light of relevant Rule 5 of U.P. Government Servants (Dying

WRIT - A No. 6703 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam