Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-05-20

WRIT - A No. 5819 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 5819 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 5819 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

A.F.R. Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:84665 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5819 of 2025 Petitioner :- Harishankar Respondent :- District Judge, Kaushambi And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Prerna Surolia,Ravi Kant Surolia Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Mishra Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard Ms. Prerna Surolia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Bushra Maryam, learned counsel for the contesting respondents. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has questioned the decision taken by the District Judge, Kaushambi on 7th August, 2024 to order re-inquiry into the charges having found the findings returned by the inquiry officer not agreeable to him. 3. The petitioner has also challenged the subsequent inquiry report as a consequence to the order dated 7th August, 2024 and also the final decision taken by the District Judge, Kaushambi/ disciplinary authority imposing penalty in the nature of two annual increament to the accumulative effects. 4. The submission advanced by Ms. Surolia, learned counsel for the petitioner is that the District Judge, namely the disciplinary authority was required to set aside the report of first

WRIT - A No. 5819 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam