Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-05-01

WRIT - A No. 5798 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 5798 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 5798 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:69172 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5798 of 2025 Petitioner :- Abhishek Hitaishi Respondent :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Navin Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,M.N. Singh Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Sri Sanjay Kumar Om, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of U.P. Public Service Commission submits that as per instructions obtained by him allowing candidate to appear even provisionally even though hard copy of application could not be received in time for the delay on the part of postal department and not Public Service Commission, would lead to floodgate of petition by such candidates. In the considered view of the Court, once the Supreme Court has made observation in the case of Sadaf Imran v. U.P. Public Service Commission (Writ Petition No. 581 of 2023 decided on 19.01.2024) that for delay in delivery by postal departmental, if the application form had been sent in time, candidate cannot be blamed, the argument advanced by learned counsel appearing of U.P. Public Service Commission, that order in such a case will open floodgate, cannot be sustained. Accordingly, respondent- Public Service Commissi

WRIT - A No. 5798 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam