VINOD @ BABLI & ORS. vs STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 27.05.2025 + CRL.M.C. 3021/2025 & CRL.M.A. 13412/2025 VINOD @ BABLI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vinay, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Pardeep Kumar, PS Maidan Garhi. Mr. M.S. Khan, Advocate for complainant with complainant in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioners have sought quashing of FIR No.59/2025 of PS Maidan Garhi for offences under Section 110/3(5) of BNS. The allegation against the petitioners is that on 11.01.2025, at about 08:30am, they stopped the complainant de facto on the way and assaulted him with bricks, stones and dandas, causing him multiple bodily injuries, though fortunately the injuries were not grievous. I have examined the MLC as well as two reports of radiologist. 2. The petitioners as well as complainant de facto (respondent no.2) are present in court, identified by their respective counsel and the Investigating Officer/SI Pardeep Kumar. It is submitted by all present that they have CRL.M.C. 3021/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH GIRISH KATHPALIA KATHPALIA Date: 2025.05.27 14:11:59 +05'30' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:27.05.2025 15:35:08 compromised the disputes. The respondent no.2 submits that he does not wish to pursue prosecution of the petitioners. 3. Further, it is informed by learned counsel for petitioners that against the present respondent no.2 also a cross FIR was registered for similar offences and the petition for quashing the same is already listed before another bench. 4. Keeping in mind the above circumstances and also the manner in which the two groups assaulted each other, c