Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-05-23

UNDER ARMOUR INC vs ANISH AGARWAL & ANR.

Citation / case number
FAO(OS) (COMM)-174/2024 2025:DHC:4243-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
UNDER ARMOUR INC
Respondent
ANISH AGARWAL & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgement delivered on: 23.05.2025 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 174/2024 & CM No.46175/2024 & 52564/2024 UNDER ARMOUR INC ..... APPELLANT versus ANISH AGARWAL & ANR ..... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case For the Appellant : Ms. Swathi Sukumar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S. Bansal, Mr. Rishi Bansal, Mr. Mankaran Singh, Mr. Kartik Malhotra, Mr. Rishabh Aggarwal & Mr. Ritik Raghuvanshi, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Samik Mukherjee, Mr. Manosij Mukherjee & Mr. Abhishek Avabhani, Advs CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J. 1. The appellant [Under Armour, Inc] has filed the present intra-court appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 [CC Act] read with Order XLIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [CPC] impugning the order dated 29.05.2024 [impugned order] passed by the 2. In terms of the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has placed certain restrictions regarding the use of the impugned marks by the respondents, but had rejected the appellant’s prayer for ad interim order restraining the respondents from using the imp

UNDER ARMOUR INC vs ANISH AGARWAL & ANR. · Niyam