TRILOK KUMAR GAMBHIR THROUGH ITS LEGAL HEIRS vs PREETI GAMBHIR AND OTHERS

Judgment text excerpt

$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 29.05.2025 + C.R.P. 199/2023 TRILOK KUMAR GAMBHIR THROUGH ITS LEGAL HEIRS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manmeet Singh Maini, Ms. Suman Rajput, Advs. with Ms. Nitika Gambhir, LR of the Petitioner versus PREETI GAMBHIR AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Kakkar, Mr. Rajesh Bhatia, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) CM APPL. 38235/2023[Condonation of delay in filing the Appeal] & CM APPL. 38237/2023[Condonation of delay in re-filing the Appeal] 1. These are the Applications filed by the Petitioner seeking condonation of delay of 228 days in filing and 54 days in re-filing the Petition. 2. In view of the order the Court proposes to pass today, learned Counsel for the Respondents submits that he has no objection if the prayers in the present Applications are allowed. 3. The Applications are accordingly allowed. The delay is condoned. CM APPL. 7989/2024[Condonation of delay in filing the Rejoinder to Reply to CM.APPL. 38235/2023] 4. This is an Application filed by the Petitioner seeking condonation of delay of 22 days in filing the Rejoinder to Reply to CM.APPL. 38235/2023. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Date:31.05.2025 C.R.P. 199/2023 Page 1 of 3 21:33:51 5. Learned Counsel for the Respondents submits that he has no objection if the prayer in the present Application is allowed. 6. The Application is allowed. The delay is condoned. C.R.P. 199/2023 7. The present Petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Section 115 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’] seeking to challenge an order dated 30.11.2022 passed by Ld. ADJ-04, Patiala House Court, New Delhi [hereinafter re