TATA CAPITAL LTD vs DINESH VASWANI

Judgment text excerpt

$~O-10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 369/2025 Date of Decision: 06.05.2025 IN THE MATTER OF: TATA CAPITAL LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, Ms. Ruchika, Mr. Sparsh Agarwal, Advs. versus DINESH VASWANI .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV ORDER PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. She has placed on record the affidavit of service which reads as under: “AFFIDAVIT I, Ruchika, D/o Suresh Lakra, aged about 26 years, counsel for the Petitioner in the present matter, having office at F-I5, Kailash Colony, New Delhi 110048, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under: 1. 1. That vide order dated 01.04.2025 notice was directed to be issued to the Respondent. In compliance of the order dated 01.04.2025, copy of the notice along with copy of the Petition was attempted to be served upon the Respondent, by Speed Post, Registered Post and Email. Service by Email: Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Signed By:AMIT KUMAR Signed SHARMA Signing Date:13.05.2025 By:PURUSHAINDRA 11:15:47 KUMAR KAURAV 2. That a copy of the petition was sent to Respondent via email dated 25.04.2025sent from the email-id of the office of the counsel for the Petitioner i.e., [email protected] at the E-mail ID of the Respondent i.e., [email protected] as mentioned at the E-mail ID of the Respondent i.e., [email protected] as mentioned in the loan agreement and Memo of Parties. It is submitted that no failure/ bounce-back message has been received at the abovementioned e-mail of the office of the counsel ([email protected]). Copy of the Email dated 25.04.2025 is Document A. Service by Speed Post: 3. It is submitted that on 24.04.2025 a copy of the petit