Delhi High Court · 2025-05-27
SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING AND FARMING ALLIANCE PRIVATE LIMITED vs SOMNATH RANGNATH PARVE
- Citation / case number
- ARB.P.-1864/2024 2025:DHC:4743
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING AND FARMING ALLIANCE PRIVATE LIMITED
- Respondent
- SOMNATH RANGNATH PARVE
Judgment text excerpt
$~O-2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 1864/2024 Date of Decision: 27.05.2025 SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING AND FARMING ALLIANCE PRIVATE LIMITED REGISTERED OFFICE AT PLOT NO. 7, KH NO. 16/17, SHIVANI ENCLAVE, RAJU EXTENSION, KAKROLA, DWARKA, DELHI 110078 .....Petitioner (Through: Mr. Kaveesh Nair and Ms. Aashna Mehra, Advs.) versus SOMNATH RANGNATH PARVE R/O GUT NO. 144, SAI HERITAGE FLAT NO. 08, NAYRA PETROL PUMP, CIDCO WATER TANK, TISGAON, AURANGABAD, MAHARASHTRA 431001 .....Respondent (Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Adv.) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV JUDGEMENT PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the 1996 Act) by the petitioner, seeking appointment of an Arbitrator, to adjudicate upon the disputes that have arisen between the parties. 2. The facts of the case would indicate that the respondent was appointed by the petitioner on 01.07.2022 and as Sales and Service Engineer Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Signed By:AMIT KUMAR Signed SHARMA Signing Date:30.05.2025 By:PURUSHAINDRA 17:41:57 KUMAR KAURAV under the Grade TE2 by issuing a letter of employment. The terms of the employment agreement necessitated for a probation period of three months from the date of commencement ending on 01.10.2022. 3. The respondent, however, preferred a resignation by an E-mail dated 19.01.2024 with a notice period of merely 30 days instead of 60 days as according to learned counsel for the petitioner is in violation of the terms of the employment agreement. 4. The petitioner, however, relieved the respondent by relieving letter dated 28.03.2023. 5. As per the case set up by the petitioner there has been multiple violation of confidenti