Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-05-22

SURAJ BHAN vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-1971/2025 2025:DHC:4187
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SURAJ BHAN
Respondent
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 22.05.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 1971/2025 & CRL.M.A. 15967/2025 SURAJ BHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek and Mr. Umesh Kumar, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for State with ASI Raj Kumar, PS Dwarka North. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.137/2025 of PS Dwarka North for offences under Section 08/20/25 NDPS Act. Broadly speaking, allegation against the accused/applicant is that on the basis of a secret information, car bearing no.DL-8C-AB-0724 was intercepted and 12 kilograms 10 grams of ganja was recovered from the same. The said car was owned by the present accused/applicant though being driven by co-accused Anil. Accordingly, after further investigations, the IO zeroed down on the accused/applicant but the latter absconded, so the BAIL APPLN. 1971/2025 pages 2. In the above backdrop, learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that the accused/applicant is innocent as his role was only to give his personal car on rent to Anil and he was not aware about the usage of the car. However