SUNITA KUMARI JAT vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6933/2025, CM APPL. 31391/2025 & CM APPL. 31392/2025 SUNITA KUMARI JAT .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Kaushambhi Vikram Singh and Mr. Shakti Narayanan, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Balendu Shekhar, CGSC with Mr. Chetan Jadon, G.P., Mr. Rajkumar Maurya, Mr. Krishna Chaitanya and Mr. Vansh Jadon, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER (ORAL) % 21.05.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. The prayer in this writ petition is only for a direction to the respondents to comply with the order dated 30 April 2025 passed in WP (C) 5606/2025 whereby the petitioner had represented against her transfer to Kishanganj. 2. The petitioner’s representation has been considered and the respondent has already passed an order dated 13 May 2025, Signature Not Verified Signed By:AAKANSHAW.P.(C) 6933/2025 Page 1 of 2 SHARMA Signing Date:23.05.2025 15:24:34 transferring the petitioner to 7th Bn Sashastra Seema Bal, Jammu. 3. Mr. Balendu Shekhar, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for the respondents, submits that Jammu is, in fact, one of the choice postings of the petitioner and, therefore, the petitioner’s request has been sympathetically considered. 4. We need not express any view thereon as the petitioner has already been granted liberty by our order dated 30 April 2025 to challenge the order passed on her representation, if she is aggrieved. 5. The prayers in this writ petition stand satisfied. 6. This writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. C. HARI SHANKAR, J. AJAY DIGPAUL, J. MAY 21, 2025/AS Click here to check corrigendum, if any Signature Not Verified Signed By:AAKANSHAW.P.(C) 6933/2025 Page 2 of 2 SHARMA Signing Date:23.05.2025 15:24:34