Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-05-23

SINGH OLYMPICS PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR MR. VIKAS GUPTA 2017 18 vs COMMISSIONER DELHI GOODS AND SERVICE TAX AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-7152/2025 2025:DHC:4382-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SINGH OLYMPICS PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR MR. VIKAS GUPTA 2017 18
Respondent
COMMISSIONER DELHI GOODS AND SERVICE TAX AND OTHERS

Judgment text excerpt

$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 23rd May, 2025 + W.P.(C) 7152/2025 & CM APPL. 32288/2025 SINGH OLYMPICS PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR MR. VIKAS GUPTA (2017-18) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar and Mr. Parveen Kumar Gambhir, Advs. (M:9811595510) versus COMMISSIONER DELHI GOODS AND SERVICE TAX AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sumit K. Batra, Advocate for GNCTD. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner- Singh Olympics Private Limited through its Director, Mr. Vikas Singh under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, assailing the Show Cause Notice dated 24th September, 2023 (hereinafter, ‘the SCN’) for the tax period July 2017 to March 2018, as also the consequent order dated 22nd December, 2023 passed by the office of Sales Tax Officer Class II/ AVATO, Delhi (hereinafter, ‘the impugned order’). 3. The petition also challenges the vires of Notification Nos 9/2023- Central Tax dated 31st March 2023 (hereinafter ‘impugned notification’). 4. The validity of the impugned notification was under consideration W.P.(C) 7152/2025 Page 1 of 9 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KESHAV Signing Date:27.05.2025 18:08:31 before this Court in a batch of petitions with the lead petition being W.P.(C) 16499/2023 titled ‘DJST Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India and Ors.’. In the said batch of petitions, on 22nd April, 2025, the parties were heard at length qua the validity of the impugned notification and accordingly, the following order was passed: “4. Submissions have been heard in part. The broad challenge to both sets of Notifications is on the ground th

SINGH OLYMPICS PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR MR. VIKAS GUPTA 2017 18 vs COMMISSIONER DELHI GOODS AND SERVICE TAX AND OTHERS · Niyam