SHUBHAM MISHRA vs HIGH COURT OF DELHI & ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7997/2025, CM APPL. 35046/2025, CM APPL. 35047/2025, CM APPL. 35048/2025 & CM APPL. 35049/2025 SHUBHAM MISHRA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shyel Trehan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ashish Kumar Pandey, Mr. Aman Naqvi, Mr. Rohan Poddar, Mr. Ryan Sinha and Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advs. versus HIGH COURT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Mr. Aman Sahani and Ms. Ashima Chopra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 29.05.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. This is a petition by a candidate who aspires to enter into the Delhi Judicial Service, for which purpose the petitioner had undertaken the Delhi Judicial Service Examination, 2023. 2. The petitioner’s contention is that the suggested answer for question number 11 (iv) of Paper-II (Civil Law-I) of the Delhi Judicial Service Examination, 2023, is incorrect. 3. The question and the suggested answers read thus: 11. Please state whether each of the following statements is true or false. (Only either 'true' or 'false' is to be written, and nothing else.) ***** (iv) An Agreement, where both the parties are under a mistake as to a