SHISHU PAL CHAUHAN vs SMT. SUDESH TYAGI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~55 & 56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 07th May, 2025 + CM(M) 3427/2024 SHISHU PAL CHAUHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.P. Rana and Mr. Siddharth Shankar, Advocates. versus SMT. SUDESH TYAGI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: None. + CM(M) 3429/2024 SHISHU PAL CHAUHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.P. Rana and Mr. Siddharth Shankar, Advocates. versus SUDESH TYAGI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) CM APPL. 27606/2025 in CM(M) 3427/2024 & CM APPL. 27610/2025 in CM(M) 3429/2024 (seeking withdrawal of the captioned petition) 1. Both the petitions have been taken up together as same and identical issue has been raised therein. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that he has not been permitted to be impleaded in the two suits in question. According to him, his application moved under Order I Rule 10 CPC should have been allowed by the learned Trial Court. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CM(M) 3427/2024 & CM(M) 3429/2024 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:08.05.2025 15:12:25 3. The next date in both the abovesaid petitions is 27.10.2025. 4. However, in view of the intervening development, petitioner, in both the petitions, has moved application seeking withdrawal of the present two petitions. 5. It is submitted that the petitioner/applicant has already re-transferred his interest in the suit property to one Ms. Anju Tyagi and the petitioner has even withdrawn his claim in the pending suits and, therefore, he does not seek his impleadment in any of the suits. 6. It is in the abovesaid subsequent development that the applications have been moved seeking withdrawal of the present two petitions. 7. In view of the averments made in the applications and after hearing Mr. Ra