SHILPA GUPTA vs ASHOK KANSAL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 22nd May, 2025 CM(M) 960/2025 & CM APPL. 31535/2025 SHILPA GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ved Prakash Sharma and Mr. Mayank Garg, Advocates versus ASHOK KANSAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vinod Dahiya, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The point raised in the present petition is very short one. 2. Petitioner herein i.e. Ms. Shilpa Gupta filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 10 lacs. 3. After completion of pleadings, the suit was taken up on 17.12.2024 and issues were framed. 4. While framing the issues, learned Trial Court also directed the plaintiff to file evidence by way of affidavits along with list of witnesses within 15 days, with advance copy to the counsel for defendant and matter was directed to be taken up 21.04.2025. 5. On 21.04.2025, plaintiff, instead, e-filed an application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC which was taken on record and copy of the same was supplied to the opposite side and the matter was fixed for reply/arguments. 6. Fact remains that, simultaneously, the right of the plaintiff to lead 2024. The impugned order reads as under: - “1. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has