SHAMIM vs STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI)

Judgment text excerpt

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 01.05.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 737/2025 SHAMIM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate versus STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State with Inspr. Virender Kumar, SHO, PS Mangolpuri and SI Ali Akram, PS Wazirabad CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant, suffering incarceration since 07.01.2023 seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 6/2023 of Police Station Wazirabad for offences under Sections 302/201/120B/34 IPC. 2. Broadly speaking, the prosecution case is that brother of the deceased lastly saw the deceased in company of the main accused Munish, who allegedly had illicit relations with wife of the deceased. Wife of the deceased is the present accused/applicant. Even as regards the allegation of illicit relations of the accused/applicant with the main accused, only one witness BAIL APPLN. 737/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH Signature Not Verified GIRISH KATHPALIA KATHPALIA Date: 2025.05.01 16:41:44 -07'00' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:01.05.2025 18:10:05 who is nephew of the deceased expressed suspicion. 3. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that there is no evidence to connect the accused/applicant with murder of the deceased. It is further submitted that the accused/applicant is a lady, suffering undertrial custody for past long time. 4. Learned APP submits that apart from suspicion of nephew of the deceased qua the illicit relations of the accused/applicant with the main accused, there is also a piece of evidence in the form of Call Detail Records, reflecting multiple phone calls between the accused/applicant and the main accused. Apart from that, it is also submitted by l