SH RAJAT KUMAR & ORS. vs THE STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 15.05.2025 + CRL.M.C. 1474/2025 & CRL.M.A. 6566/2025 SH RAJAT KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Dr. Ram Avtar Sharma, Advocate for petitioners with petitioners no.1 and 2 in person. versus THE STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with IO/SI KM Banti, PS Vasant Vihar Mr. Dharmender Sharma, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Petitioners have sought quashing of FIR No. 94/2023 of PS Vasant Vihar for offences under Section 498A/406/34 IPC and the proceedings arising out of the same on the ground that parties have compromised all their disputes. Petitioners no.1 and 2 have personally appeared and it is informed that petitioners no.3 and 4 are trying to appear through video conferencing but on account of some technical issue at their end, they cannot join. The complainant de facto (respondent no.2) also has appeared in court. The parties are identified by their respective counsel and IO/SI KM Banti. CRL.M.C.1474/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH GIRISH KATHPALIA KATHPALIA Date: 2025.05.15 18:42:27 +05'30' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:15.05.2025 19:27:04 2. I have spoken with the parties in Hindi. 3. It is stated by respondent no.2 that she has compromised all the disputes with the petitioners. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 were blessed with a daughter, presently aged 04 years. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 have got their marriage dissolved by way of a divorce decree dated 16.12.2024 with mutual consent. Parties have agreed that custody of their daughter shall remain with the respondent no.2 while petitioners shall have the liberty to