SH. KUNAL AGGARWAL & ORS. vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 27.05.2025 + W.P.(CRL) 1653/2025 & CRL.M.A. 15471/2025 SH. KUNAL AGGARWAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Yadav, Advocate. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC for State with ASI Usha, PS Vivek Vihar. Ms. Meghna Kar, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.138/2023 of PS Vivek Vihar for offences under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that they have compromised the disputes with the complainant de facto (respondent no.2 herein). All the petitioners and respondent no.2 are present in court, duly identified by their respective counsel and the Investigating Officer/ASI Usha. I have spoken with the parties in Hindi. 2. It is stated by both sides that parties have compromised the disputes arising out of matrimony of petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, who have got their marriage dissolved by way of decree of divorce dated 14.02.2025. W.P.(CRL) 1653/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.05.27 14:07:57 +05'30' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:27.05.2025 15:35:08 No child was born in the matrimony of petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2. Respondent no.2 submits that she has received back her entire stridhan and that she does not want to claim any maintenance or permanent alimony. Respondent no.2 submits that she is well educated and shall not ever claim any maintenance or alimony. Respondent no.2 also submits that she does not wish to pursue prosecution of the petitioners. 3. Detailed statements of the parties have already been recorded by the Joint Registrar. 4. Consider