SH DEEPAK ARORA & ORS vs SMT KAVITA ARORA & ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~95 and 96 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 22th May, 2025 + CS(OS) 189/2016 SH DEEPAK ARORA & ORS .....Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Kajal Chandra and Ms. Hatenimawi, Advocates. versus SMT KAVITA ARORA & ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. J.S. Bakshi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anshu Davar, Ms. Chandrika Singh, Mr. Navroop Bakshi and Mr. Amitesh Bakshi, Advocates for D1 and D2. Ms. Vandana Khurana, Advocate for D6 to D15. 96 + EX.P. 56/2017 SH. DEEPAK ARORA & ORS .....Decree Holders Through: Mrs. Kajal Chandra and Ms. Hatenimawi, Advocates. versus SMT. KAVITA ARORA & ORS .....Judgement Debtors Through: Mr. J.S. Bakshi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anshu Davar, Ms. Chandrika Singh, Mr. Navroop Bakshi and Mr. Amitesh Bakshi, Advocates for JD1 and JD2. Ms. Vandana Khurana, Advocate for JD6 to JD15. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGEMENT JYOTI SINGH, J. (ORAL) I.A. 40577/2024 1. This is an application preferred on behalf of the Review Petitioners i.e., Defendants No. 1 and 2 in the suit, for condonation of delay of 2828 days in filing the review petition. 2. It is stated in the application that delay in filing the review petition Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CS(OS) 189/2016 and connected matter Page 1 of 22 By:KAMAL KUMAR Signing Date:26.05.2025 19:46:10 occurred on account of the fact that Defendants No. 1 and 2 were unaware of the original Will dated 26.06.1978 executed by Smt. Hans Kaur in their favour was in the custody and possession of Union Bank of India, which fact came to their knowledge only recently on account of the orders passed by this Court. 3. It is explained that on 20.05.2024, Court passed orders directing the General Manager, Union Bank of India to submit all original documents pertaining to the suit property, deposit