Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-05-01

SANJAY KUMAR YADAV vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-3786/2024 2025:DHC:3145-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SANJAY KUMAR YADAV
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 16.04.2025 Date of Decision: 01.05.2025 + W.P.(C) 3786/2024 SANJAY KUMAR YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Sarika Singh, SPC with Mr. Rahul Singh, Adv. for UOI. Mr. Ajay Pal, Law Officer, CRPF. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT % AJAY DIGPAUL, J. 1. The instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking the following reliefs: “I. Issue a Writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction thereby quashing and setting aside the impugned Trade/Skill test result dated 23.02.2024 of the petitioner only to the extent of marks given to him for the purpose of work experience, vide which he has been declared as „Not Qualified‟ for appointment on the post of Sub-Inspector (Staff Nurse) in the Paramedical Staff Recruitment Examination 2020; II. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondents thereby directing the respondents Signature Not Verified Signed By:AAKANSHA W.P.(C) 3786/2024 Page 1 of 17 SHARMA Signing Date:01.05.2025 17:39:11 to declare the Petitioner as „Qualified‟ candidate in the Trade/Skill Test by considering his work experience of more than five years and as such thereby giving him 5 marks and thereafter call the petitioner for Stage IV i.e. Medical Examination and lastly consider the candidature of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Sub- Inspector (Staff Nurse) with the respondent department as per law; III. Pass such further and other orders and directions as this Hon‟ble Court may deem fit and proper.” Brief facts 2. A recruitment process

SANJAY KUMAR YADAV vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS · Niyam