SALEEM AHMAD vs SHRI SUDARSHAN KUMAR JOSHI & ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 28th May, 2025 CM(M) 963/2025 & CM APPL. 31719-31720/2025 SALEEM AHMAD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate. versus SHRI SUDARSHAN KUMAR JOSHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Munish Chhoker and Ms. Jyoti Verma, Advocates for respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner herein has suffered a decree of possession/rent and mesne profits. 2. Pursuant thereto, an Execution Petition was filed before the learned Trial Court. 3. Possession has already been received by the concerned Decree Holder and now the decree is qua rent/mesne profit. 4. On 04.04.2025, Judgment Debtor appeared before the learned Executing Court in person and Decree Holder requested that warrants of arrest be issued against Judgment Debtor. 5. Learned Trial Court, accordingly, issued show-cause notice to Judgment Debtor as to why he should not be committed to civil imprisonment under Order XXI Rule 37 CPC and fixed up the matter for 15.05.2025. 6. On 15.05.2025, there was no appearance from the side of Judgment Debtor and even notice issued in relation to application moved under Order XXI Rule 37