Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Bombay High Court · 2025-05-06

RESHU SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA

Citation / case number
WP/1238/2024
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
RESHU SINGH
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE 1. Union of India, Through Ministry of Education, Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi. 2. Vice Chancellor, Central Sanskrit University, 56-57, Institutional Area, Janakpuri, New Delhi – 110 058 3. The Chairman, Managing Committee, Mumbadevi Adarsh Sanskrit Mahavidyalay, Kulapati Munshi Marg, Mumbai- 400 007. 4. The Principal, Mumbadevi Adarsh Sanskrit Mahavidyalay, Kulapati Munshi Marg, Mumbai- 400 007. … Respondents --- Mr.J.P. Cama, Senior Advocate with Mr.Aseem Naphade, Mr.Arsh Misra, Ms. Khushboo Agarwal, Ms.Ruchika and Ms.Mrunmayi for the Petitioner. Mr. Niranjan Shimpi with Mrs.Shehnaz V. Bharucha for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 (UOI). Mr.Vivek Khemka for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4- Management/ Employer. --- 1 Trupti wp-1238-2024.odt CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. DATE : 6TH MAY, 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: Ravindra V. Ghuge,J.) 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of the parties. 2. It is often remarked in the Courts, in a given case, that it is like an “open and shut case”. This is one case wherein we can say that this case is an open and shut case. 3. अमृतम तू वि द्या is the motto of the Employer of the Petitioner