RAVI RAJ SABHARWAL vs DALIT MANAV UTTHAN SANSTHAN

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on 06.05.2025 + C.R.P. 94/2023 RAVI RAJ SABHARWAL .....Petitioner versus DALIT MANAV UTTHAN SANSTHAN .....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kohli, Ms. Ritu Sobti, Mr. S.S. Sobti & Ms. Dipika Prasad, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr. Praveen Kumar Singh, Mr. Sanal Nambiar & Ms. Chetna Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN JUDGMENT 1. The present petition is filed challenging the order dated 10.03.2023 (hereafter ‘impugned order’) passed by the learned Additional District Judge (hereafter ‘Trial Court’), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in CS No. 110/2021 pursuant to which, the application filed by the petitioner under Order XII Rule 6 read with Order XV Rule 1 of the Code of Civil procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’) for passing a preliminary decree of possession on admission, was dismissed. 2. Briefly stated, the petitioner/ plaintiff leased out the ground floor of the property bearing Khasra No. 262, Karawal Nagar, Delhi -110094 (hereafter ‘suit premises’) to the Signature Not Verified Signed By:SHIKHA C.R.P. 94/2023 Page 1 of 18 SEHGAL Signing Date:09.05.2025 20:22:55 respondent/ defendant, vide a Lease Agreement dated 09.04.2018, on a monthly rent of ₹1,65,000/-plus taxes, for a period of eleven months, w.e.f. 01.04.2018. 3. The said tenancy was terminated with efflux of time on 31.03.2019, whereafter no fresh lease agreement was executed between the parties, however the respondent continued in the occupation of the suit premises. 4. Since the respondent did not vacate the suit premises, the petitioner filed a suit bearing CS No. 110/2021, seeking the following reliefs: 4.1. Decree of possession of the suit premises in favour of the petitioner/ plaintiff; 4.2. Directio