RAJENDER @ KALLU vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 28.05.2025 + W.P.(CRL) 1813/2025 RAJENDER @ KALLU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chetan Bhardwaj, Ms. Priyal Bhardwaj, Mr. Pulkit Tripathi and Mr. Dhanush Kumar, Advocates. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC for State with Inspector Ravi Kumar, PS Maurya Enclave. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks emergency parole for four weeks. 2. At the outset, learned ASC appearing on advance intimation submits that the petitioner has concealed one of the earlier similar petitions. It is submitted by the ASC that this is the third petition on the same cause of action. It is disclosed by learned ASC that initially, for the same relief the petitioner filed W.P.(CRL) 1554/2025 and during pendency of the same, he filed another writ petition, numbered W.P.(CRL) 1555/2025 after concealing the earlier writ petition. The W.P.(CRL) 1555/2025 was disposed of vide order dated 08.05.2025 directing the competent authority to decide parole application of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible but positively within time prescribed by law and the petitioner would file appropriate petition depending upon decision or even indecision of the competent W.P.(CRL) 1813/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH GIRISH KATHPALIA KATHPALIA Date: 2025.05.28 14:22:55 +05'30' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:28.05.2025 17:52:15 authority. Copy of that order dated 08.05.2025 is Annexure P-3. 3. But W.P.(CRL) 1554/2025 was concealed in W.P.(CRL) 1555/2025 and this petition as well. On being asked, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that he did not disclose about W.P.(CRL) 1554/2025 because that petition