RAGHAV MITTAL vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 14.05.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 1847/2025, CRL.M.A. 14938/2025 & CRL.M.A. 14939/2025 RAGHAV MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for State with Inspector Ravinder Dagar, PS K. N. Katju Marg. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks interim bail in case FIR No. 251/2024 of PS K. N. Katju Marg for offence under Section 103(1)/3(5) of BNS (Section 302/34 IPC). 2. This is second interim Bail Application on medical grounds. Earlier, the accused/applicant was granted interim bail by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 28.03.2025 for a period of 30 days for medical treatment of seizures. But the accused/applicant did not take any treatment for seizures, though he fell down and suffered a knee injury and took treatment for the same from Action Medical Institute, a private hospital. During pendency of BAIL APPLN. 1847/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed KATHPALIA Date: 2025.05.14 17:58:19 +05'30' By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:15.05.2025 09:09:32 that knee injury treatment, the accused/applicant also sought extension of the interim bail, which was declined by the learned Trial Court vide detailed order dated 30.04.2025. Hence, the present interim Bail Application. 3. Learned counsel for the accused/applicant submits that the earlier interim bail got exhausted in surgical treatment of the knee injury, so now again interim bail is required for treatment of seizures. 4. Learned APP accepting notice strongly objects to grant of another spell of interim bail in view of seriousness of charges against the accused/applica