Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-05-20

PONANGI LAKSHMI SUNEETHA vs SATYANARAYANAMMA GANDHAM AND ANR.

Citation / case number
CM(M)-939/2025 2025:DHC:4151
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
PONANGI LAKSHMI SUNEETHA
Respondent
SATYANARAYANAMMA GANDHAM AND ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 20th May, 2025 CM(M) 939/2025 & CM APPL. 30848-30849/2025 PONANGI LAKSHMI SUNEETHA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Tanu Priya Gupta and Ms. Khushi Sharma, Advocates versus SATYANARAYANAMMA GANDHAM AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Azra Rehman and Mr. Zakir Rehman, Advocates for R-1 & R-2 (Through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner is defending a petition filed under Section 372 of Indian Succession Act for grant of succession certificate. 2. She is aggrieved by two orders. 3. First order is dated 13.01.2025 whereby her right to lead evidence has been closed and the other order is dated 16.04.2025 whereby her request to place on record additional documents did not find favour with the learned Trial Court. 4. During course of the arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that she is restricting her request, merely, for the purposes of permitting her to enter into witness box and she is not requesting for placing on record any additional document. 5. On asking of this Court, learned counsel for petitioner contacted learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 & 2 and on the basis of