NAMAN LAKHANPAL vs VINEET KUMAR LAKHANPAL

Judgment text excerpt

$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 28.05.2025 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 205/2025 NAMAN LAKHANPAL .....Appellant Through: Ms. Seema Seth and Mr. Satish Panchal, Advs. versus VINEET KUMAR LAKHANPAL .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 33835/2025 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. MAT.APP.(F.C.) 205/2025 and CM APPL. 33834/2025 2. This appeal has been filed challenging the Order dated 17.05.2025 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as, ‘Family Court’) in Execution Petition, being Ex.No. 9/2025, titled Vineet Kumar Lakhanpal v. Naman Lakhanpal, directing the appellant to comply with the Order dated 17.05.2024 passed by this Court in MAT.APP.(F.C.) 215/2022, titled Vineet Kumar Lakhanpal v. Naman Lakhanpal, and at the same time, directing the respondent to pay the travel and stay expenses to the appellant herein in Signature Not Verified Signed MAT.APP.(F.C.) 205/2025 By:PRIYADARSHANI JAIN Page 1 of 7 Signing Date:29.05.2025 14:43:21 accordance with the Order dated 31.05.2024 passed by this Court in CM No. 34431/2024, and the Order dated 06.12.2024 passed by this Court in Review Pet. 463/2024, filed in the abovementioned Matrimonial Appeal. 3. To give a brief background to the grievance raised by the learned counsel for the appellant, this Court by its Judgment dated 17.05.2024, while disposing of the Matrimonial Appeal filed by the respondent herein, had made arrangement with respect to the visitation of the children, inter alia, directing as under: “26... ii. The respondent shall bring the children to Delhi during their school summer vacations for a