NAJRUL@KUTI vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Judgment text excerpt

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 08.05.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 1362/2025 & CRL.M.A. 10570/2025 NAJRUL@KUTI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Suraj Prakash Sharma, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for State with SI Dinesh Kumar, PS Narela Industrial Area CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Learned APP files status report, which is accepted across the board, to be scanned and made part of the record. 2. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No.853/2024 of PS Narela Industrial Area for offence under Section 21/29 NDPS Act. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant is recovery of 9.69 grams of heroin, which falls under the category of intermediate quantity. Apart from this, learned APP submits that there is also telephonic connectivity between the accused/applicant and the supplier Saddam of the BAIL APPLN.1362/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.05.08 18:08:43 +05'30' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:08.05.2025 19:10:15 contraband but till date, neither the CDRs nor the CAF have been taken on record of the investigation. 3. It is submitted by the IO/SI Dinesh Kumar that he intends to file the CDRs and CAF with the supplementary chargesheet. But the supplementary chargesheet would pertain to other accused persons while against the present accused/applicant, chargesheet has already been filed. Learned APP submits that the IO has applied for certified copies of CDRs and CAF but the same are awaited. But on being called upon to at least show the letter written by the IO to the concerned authorities for supply of CDRs and/or CAF, the IO states that he cannot show a