Delhi High Court · 2025-05-27
MRS NEELIMA CHADHA vs JATINDER TALWAR ALIAS MICKEY TALWAR & ANR.
- Citation / case number
- CRL.REV.P.(MAT.)-255/2025 2025:DHC:4649
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- MRS NEELIMA CHADHA
- Respondent
- JATINDER TALWAR ALIAS MICKEY TALWAR & ANR.
Judgment text excerpt
$~63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 27th May, 2025 + CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 255/2025, CRL.M.A. 16679/2025, CRL.M.A. 16680/2025 & CRL.M.A. 16681/2025 MRS NEELIMA CHADHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Taneja, Advocate versus JATINDER TALWAR ALIAS MICKEY TALWAR .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U G D M E N T (oral) 1. Revision Petition under Sections 438/442/401/397 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’) has been filed to set aside the Order dated 27.01.2025 whereby the Petitioner has been granted interim maintenance in the sum of Rs.15,000/- per month, in M.T. No. 585/2022 under Section 125 Cr.P.C. 2. Briefly stated, Petitioner got married to the Respondent according to Hindu Rites and Customs on 01.02.2017. Immediately thereafter, the Respondent/husband went to New Zealand for his professional commitment, while the Petitioner stayed back at her matrimonial home i.e. A-88, Hari Nagar, New Delhi. Petitioner then after about three months, travelled to New Zealand on 30.05.2017 where she resided with the Respondent in Hamilton, New Zealand as husband and wife. Petitioner- Mrs. Neelima returned to India on 24.03.2018. No child was born from their wedlock. Signature Not Verified Signed By:RITA CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 255/2025 Page 1 of 7 SHARMA Signing Date:29.05.2025 17:28:55 3. The Respondent asserted that from June, 20117 till July, 2017, she accidently saw some e-mails, which Respondent had forwarded to various email ids for seeking sexual favours even after their marriage. Such sexual favours were also meant for earning money through dirty talks. 4. In around October, 2017, facing physical and mental torture and abuse from Respondent/husband, she de