MOHIT @ ROHIT vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 29.05.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 2098/2025 & CRL.M.A. 17085/2025 MOHIT @ ROHIT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate (through videoconferencing) versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State with SI Vinod, SI Ravi and SI Vikas Rathee, PS Inderpuri CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No.167/2024 of PS Inderpuri for offences under Section 109(1)/3(5) of BNS. 2. Briefly stated, the allegation against the accused/applicant is that he along with his co-accused Gattu stabbed the complainant de facto and fled away. As per MLC, the complainant de facto was found to have suffered a stab wound on right side of upper abdomen, left upper arm and left thigh with no active bleeding noticed. The nature of injuries was opined by the BAIL APPLN. 2098/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH GIRISH KATHPALIA KATHPALIA Date: 2025.05.29 14:07:37 +05'30' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:29.05.2025 15:01:45 doctor as simple and complainant de facto was discharged on the same day after treatment. According to the statement of complainant de facto, in the first instance, he scolded S (a child in conflict with law) after which the matter got over and the complainant de facto returned home. Subsequently, the complainant de facto got a phone call challenging him to come out, after which when he came out, he was assaulted by the accused/applicant and his associate. 3. On behalf of accused/applicant, it is submitted by learned counsel that the incident even as alleged, occurred in a fit of rage and it was not a pre- planned attack. It is also contended that the acc