MOHIT BHUNSALI vs INTEC CAPITAL LTD. & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 14th May, 2025 + CM(M) 872/2025 & CM APPL. 28134-28135/2025 MOHIT BHUNSALI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Mr. Kunal Sachdeva, Ms. Nakshatra Shandilya and Ms. K. Vajpayee, Advocates. versus INTEC CAPITAL LTD. & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pranav Goyal, Ms. Pooja Chaudhary, Mr. Vishant Singh and Ms. Mreeganka Goyal, Advocates for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by JD No.4 i.e. Mohit Bhunsali. 2. When the Execution Petition No.137/2021 was taken up by the learned Executing Court on 02.05.2025, noticing that the employer of JD No.4 had refused to accept the notice, it directed issuance of bailable warrants of Rs.5,000/- against Mr. Abhishek Saini, who is stated to be HR of IB Montaro Pvt. Ltd. (employer of JD No.4). 3. Learned counsel for JD No.4 submits that JD No.4 has already filed an application before the learned Executing Court requesting for sine die adjournment of the Execution Petition, in view of interim statutory moratorium under Section 96 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 qua JD No.4. 4. He submits that there is no consideration or decision on the aforesaid application and, straightway, notice has been issued to the employer of JD No.4. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CM(M) 872/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:17.05.2025 12:55:32 5. However, during the course of the arguments, he submits that said Mr. Abhishek Saini has no intention to defy or disobey the notice issued by the Court and on instructions, it is informed that he would appear before the Court, himself. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the learned Trial Court may be requested to consider the abo