MOHD YUSUF vs KANWAR SINGH SAINI SINCE DECEASED THOUGH LRS

Judgment text excerpt

$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 30th May, 2025 + CM(M) 1022/2025 & CM APPL. 33542-33543/2025 MOHD YUSUF .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shree Prakash Sinha with Mr. Rakesh Mishra and Mr. Rishabh Kumar, Advocates. versus KANWAR SINGH SAINI SINCE DECEASED THOUGH LRS .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner is a decree holder and has filed an execution petition which is registered as EX. 200/2023 titled as Mohd Yusuf vs Kanwar Singh Saini. 2. It seems that in the abovesaid Execution Petition, some objection has been filed by the Judgment Debtor himself. 3. The abovesaid objection petition was taken up by learned Executing Court on 29.04.2025 and following order has been passed:- “18 EX 200/23 MOHD. YUSUF VS. KANWAR SINGH SAINI 29.04.2025 Present: Sh. Rakesh Mishra, Ld. counsel for the DH alongwith DH. Sh. Roshan Lal Saini, Ld. counsel for the JD alongwith LRs i.e. JDs No.1B/Sh. Vikram Saini and 1C/Sh. Gaurav Saini. 1. Arguments on objections heard. 2. Be listed for clarifications on 21.07.2025.” Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CM(M) 1022/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:31.05.2025 15:19:46 4. The sole grievance of the decree holder, and rightly so, is to the effect that the learned Execution Court should have decided the objections expeditiously, instead of postponing the objection petition for a period of around three months and that to for simply clarification and not even for orders. 5. This Court is conscious of the specific directions given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Periyammal v. V. Rajamani, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 507 which mandates expeditious disposal of Execution Petition. 6. When the arguments on the Objection Petition had been heard by the learned Exe