MOHD MUBARAK vs MASJID NOOR AHMED, WAKF & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 26th May, 2025 + CM(M) 922/2025 & CM APPL. 30205-30206/2025 MOHD MUBARAK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Mathur & Mr. Akshat Singhal, Advocates versus MASJID NOOR AHMED, WAKF & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Advocate (Appearance not given) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Learned counsel for respondent/decree-holder appears pursuant to the notice issued by the Court. 2. After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for respondent/ decree-holder submits that without prejudice to his rights and contentions, he would have no objection if one last and final opportunity is granted to objector to lead evidence. He also submits that in view of specific directions given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Periyammal v. V. Rajamani, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 507, Execution Petition has to be fast-tracked and has to be disposed of within six months and, therefore, learned Executing Court be requested accordingly. 3. Next date before the learned Executing Court is stated to be 10.06.2025. 4. The present petition is disposed of with direction that learned Trial Court shall give one last and final, but effective, opportunity to Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CM(M) 922/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:27.05.2025 16:19:56 petitioner/objector for leading evidence and both the sides shall appear before the learned Executing Court on 29.05.2025. Objector/petitioner would also appear before the learned Trial Court and depending upon the board position, it will be upto the learned Trial Court to either record the evidence of such objector same day or to record it on some other day, after ascertaining availability and convenience of both the sides. 5. Learned Execution Court shal