MATA AMRITANANDMAYI MATH THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OM PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS AMRITAPURI, P.O. KOLLAM, KERALA vs ANIL KUMAR JAIN & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20th May, 2025 + CS(OS) 339/2022 & I.A. 9113/2022 MATA AMRITANANDMAYI MATH THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OM PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS AMRITAPURI, P.O. KOLLAM, KERALA .....Plaintiff Through: versus ANIL KUMAR JAIN & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv., Mr. Om Prakash, Adv., Mr. Ashok Malik, Adv., Mr. Chandresh Pratap, Adv., Ms. Swati Mishra, Ms. Nayoleeka Purty, Mr. Samrat Pasriccha, Adv. for D-1 to 5. Mr. Charan S. Verma, Mr. Ramnesh Verma & Mr. Chiranjeev Singh, Advocates for D-2 and D-3. + CS(OS) 340/2022 & I.A. 9117/2022 ANIL KUMAR JAIN .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ankur Jain, Advocate versus MATA AMRITANANDAMAYI MATH & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv., Mr. Om Prakash, Adv., Mr. Ashok Malik, Adv., Mr. Chandresh Pratap, Adv., Ms. Swati Mishra, Ms. Nayoleeka Purty, Mr. Samrat Pasriccha, Adv. for D-1 to 5. + CS(OS) 793/2022 & I.A. 21290/2022 ANIL KUMAR JAIN .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ankur Jain, Advocate versus MATA AMRITANANDMAYI MATH & ANR. .....Defendants Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:MAMTA RANI Signing Date:20.05.2025 CS(OS) 339/2022 & Ors. 18:20:06 Page 1 of 39 Through: Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv., Mr. Om Prakash, Adv., Mr. Ashok Malik, Adv., Mr. Chandresh Pratap, Adv., Ms. Swati Mishra, Ms. Nayoleeka Purty, Mr. Samrat Pasriccha, Adv. for D-1 to 5. % CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA JUDGMENT MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J: I.A. 9117/2022 in CS(OS) 340/2022 1. This application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’) has been filed by the plaintiff seeking interim injunction for restraining defendant nos. 1 to 4 from entering into the land admeasuring 504 sq. yards falling in Mustatil 29, Killa