MALINI ISRANI vs VED PRAKASH ISRANI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 23rd May, 2025 CM(M) 3591/2024 & CM APPL. 59851/2024 MALINI ISRANI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Meenakshi Rawat, Advocate. versus VED PRAKASH ISRANI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Viraj Dataar Sr. Adv with Mr. R.S.Sahni, Shrikant, Ms. Jasmine Sahni & Ms. Ashmine Sahni, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The report has been received from the learned Principle Judge, Headquarters, Family Courts, Dwarka which is indicative of the fact that the evidence in Family Court cases, wherever it is to be recorded by a Local Commissioner, is recorded in two earmarked rooms. 2. In view of the above, the contentions coming from the side of petitioner herein is that it was being recorded in open is completely fallacious. 3. During course of arguments, petitioner, however, submitted that learned Trial Court may be requested to record evidence, instead of the parties being relegated to a Local Commissioner. 4. Though, there is no merit and substance in her such contention, in order to ensure that there is no further delay in the matter and in order to repel any misapprehension in her mind and with the con