Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-05-20

MADHU TAYAL vs SHRI GHANSHYAM DAS TAYAL

Citation / case number
CMI-7/2025 2025:DHC:4094
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
MADHU TAYAL
Respondent
SHRI GHANSHYAM DAS TAYAL
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 20th May, 2025 CMI 7/2025 & CM APPL. 30177-81/2025 MADHU TAYAL .....Appellant Through: Mr. Amrit Pal S. Gambir, Ms. Pooja Saini, Mr. Akash and Ms. Monika Saini, Advs. versus SHRI GHANSHYAM DAS TAYAL .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA MINI PUSHKARNA, J (ORAL) 1. The present matter has been received on transfer. 2. The present appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and decree dated 02nd December, 2024, passed by the Court of District Judge-02, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in CS No. 2855/2016 (Old CS No. 233/2013). 3. By way of the impugned judgment and decree, the appellant herein has been directed to handover the premises, i.e., 30/75 (Plot No. 75 & Block No. 30), area measuring 45.99 sq. mtrs., i.e., 55 sq. yds, along with its whole structure built up thereon, out of Khasra No. 811 Min, situated in the area of Village Chandrawali, Shahdara at the abadi of Vishwas Nagar Shahdara, Delhi-110032, to the respondent. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the husband 5. He submits that the respondent is not the actual owner of the premises in questio

MADHU TAYAL vs SHRI GHANSHYAM DAS TAYAL · Niyam