Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-05-29

M/S SCHINDLER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs PARNIKA COMMERCIAL AND ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.

Citation / case number
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)-165/2025 2025:DHC:4899
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
M/S SCHINDLER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent
PARNIKA COMMERCIAL AND ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 29.05.2025 + O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 165/2025 M/S SCHINDLER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Kripal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Joel, Mr. Ujjval Gupta, Mr. Shivank Aggarwal, Mr. Dhruv Chatrath, Advs. versus PARNIKA COMMERCIAL AND ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Ms. Muskan Gupta, Mr. Ajay Sabharwal, Mr. Abeere Malik, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH : JASMEET SINGH, J (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ad interim injunction restraining the respondent No. 1 from invoking two bank guarantees, i.e. the Advance Bank Guarantee (“ABG”) and the Performance Bank Guarantee (“PBG”), totaling to Rs.1,14,40,676/-, issued in favour of the respondent. 2. Vide the Order dated 07.05.2025 passed by this Court, in paragraph Nos. 13, 14, 15 and 16, while staying the bank guarantees, it was held as under: “13. As per the averments of the petitioner, the respondent no.1 has not completed the office building or made it ready for 14. Further, the advance bank guarantee was f