Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-05-23

M/S J RAMAN AND COMPANY & ORS. vs M/S RKG POLYMERS

Citation / case number
CM(M)-976/2025 2025:DHC:4361
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
M/S J RAMAN AND COMPANY & ORS.
Respondent
M/S RKG POLYMERS

Judgment text excerpt

$~76 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 23rd May, 2025 + CM(M) 976/2025 & CM APPL. 32274-32276/2025 M/S J RAMAN AND COMPANY & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Kumar with Mr. Atul Singh Rawat, Advocates. versus M/S RKG POLYMERS .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners are defending a Commercial suit which is at the stage of final arguments. When plaintiff entered into witness box for cross examination, during cross examination, the concerned witness denied his signatures on settlement agreement. Thereafter, the defendants moved an application seeking expert opinion with respect to his such signatures appearing on the settlement agreement. 2. However, learned Trial Court vide order dated 18.03.2025, permitted him to withdraw the abovesaid application, with liberty to file it afresh. 3. A copy of such order dated 18.03.2025 has also been shown during the course of hearing. 4. It is submitted that accordingly, when DE was over and when they moved an application in this regard, the learned Trial Court has rather Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CM(M) 976/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:26.05.2025 11:04:12 dismissed the abovesaid application on 13.05.2025. 5. Such order is under challenge. 6. The Court has gone through the application dated 27.02.2025 filed by defendants and it seems that there is no averment to the abovesaid effect, in the abovesaid application. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioners, in all fairness, submits that due to some oversight, the abovesaid important aspect could not be brought to the notice of the learned Trial Court which has resulted in dismissal of the abovesaid application. 8. The present petition is, accordingly, disposed of with li

M/S J RAMAN AND COMPANY & ORS. vs M/S RKG POLYMERS · Niyam