M/S A.P.APPARELS vs THE LABOUR COMMISSIONER & ORS.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 23.05.2025 W.P.(C) 15801/2023, CM APPL. 63583/2023 M/S A.P.APPARELS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneesh Bahri, Advocate. versus THE LABOUR COMMISSIONER & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shikha and Mr. Tarun Kumar, Advocates for R-3 alongwith R-3 in person. W.P.(C) 16239/2023, CM APPL. 65320/2023 M/S A.P.APPARELS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneesh Bahri, Advocate. versus THE LABOUR COMMISSIONER & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shikha and Mr. Tarun Kumar, Advocates for R-3 alongwith R-3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. By way of above-noted petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks setting aside of the impugned awards dated 05.09.2019 passed in ID No. 9750/2016 and 9751/2016 2. Since both the petitions have been filed by the same petitioner against the respondents/workmen who claim themselves to be their employees and further in view of the common submissions having been addressed, both the petitions are taken up for consideration and disposed of by this common judgment. 3. Upon claims being raised by the workmen, namely Indal Kumar