Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-05-01

KASTURI DEVI vs RAVI BUNDELA AND ORS

Citation / case number
CM(M)-802/2025 2025:DHC:3252
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
KASTURI DEVI
Respondent
RAVI BUNDELA AND ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 01st May, 2025 CM(M) 802/2025 & CM APPL. 26206/2025 KASTURI DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Gahlaut, Ms. Himanshi Gahlaut and Mr. Chandan Kumar, Advocates. versus RAVI BUNDELA AND ORS .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner filed a civil suit seeking recovery of Rs.32,62,500/-. 2. After completion of pleadings, petitioner/plaintiff moved an application before the learned Trial Court seeking appointment of a Local Commissioner for the purposes of recording evidence. 3. When such application was taken up by the learned Trial Court on 04.03.2025, merely, on the basis of the oral opposition of the defendants, the application has been dismissed and the parties have been directed to lead evidence before the Court. 4. Such order is under challenge. 5. Learned counsel for petitioner/plaintiff submits that in order to expedite the recording of the evidence, he had moved the abovesaid 6. He further submits that even if the defendant were not inclined to bear the expenses of the Local Commissioner, the plaintiff would have ensured that fee/expenses in this

KASTURI DEVI vs RAVI BUNDELA AND ORS · Niyam