KAPIL DEV vs LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~14&15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 09.05.2025 + W.P.(C) 3832/2025 (14) KAPIL DEV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhinash Agarwal, Advocate. versus LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kamal Mehta, Adv. Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Mr. Manish Kumar Singh and Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 3873/2025 (15) KAPIL DEV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhinash Agarwal, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.K. Tyagi, SPC and Mr. Shriram Tiwary, GP for UOI (through v/c). Mr. Kamal Mehta, Adv. Mr. Indraj Singh Rai, SSC alongwith Mr. Sanjeev Menon and Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Advocates for R3 to 9. Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Mr. Manish Kumar Singh and Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petitions have been filed by the petitioner under Article Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 3832/2025 and connected matter Page 1 of 7 By:CHINU LUTHRA Signing Date:03.06.2025 04:36:15 226 of the Constitution of India seeking, inter alia, that the Life Insurance Corporation of India [LIC], Central Vigilance Commission [CVC], and the concerned personnel/officers therein, be directed to conduct an appropriate investigation into the complaint/s filed by the petitioner against his father-in- law, and set aside the action of the said respondents whereby the petitioner’s complaint/s were closed. 2. At the outset, it is noticed that the factual matrix is identical in these petitions, and the petitioner raises the same grounds against the common respondents. The only difference is that there are two different complaints filed by the petitioner, because of which two separate petitions have been filed. However, these complaints are also si