KAMAL KUMAR & ANR. vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 20.05.2025 + CRL.M.C. 391/2025, CRL.M.A. 1927/2025 & CRL.M.A. 1928/2025 KAMAL KUMAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Tarun, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with IO/SI Kiran Dayal, PS Moti Nagar. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 241/2016 of PS Moti Nagar for offences under Section 354/354B/506/509/34 IPC. Both petitioners and the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) have personally appeared and are identified by their respective counsel and IO/SI Kiran Dayal. 2. I have spoken with the parties in Hindi. 3. Although the offences under Section 354/354B IPC also form part of the chargesheet, the allegations do not appear to be specific. At the same time, the allegations do not appear to be exaggerated, so I am inclined to CRL.M.C.391/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH Signature Not Verified GIRISH KATHPALIA KATHPALIA Date: 2025.05.20 17:36:59 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:20.05.2025 18:45:38 invoke inherent powers in this case. 4. Both sides submit that now they have sorted out their differences and are living peacefully in the same vicinity. The respondent no.2 specifically requests that proceedings against the petitioners be quashed so that they live peacefully as good neighbours. 5. Learned APP submits that in order to ensure that the petitioners do not repeat their misconduct, they be burdened with some costs. 6. In view of the above circumstances, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice and permanent quietus between the two neighbours, not to push them th