JAYANT GHADIA vs DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE HQ ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE CENTRAL TIS HAZARI COURT DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 05th May, 2025 + CM(M) 833/2025 & CM APPL. 27081/2025 & CM APPL. 27082/2025 JAYANT GHADIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Visheshwar Shrivastav and Mr. Manoj Kumar Gautam, Advocates. versus DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE HQ ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE CENTRAL TIS HAZARI COURT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Swapan Singhal and Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Standing Counsel, Civil, GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The grievance of the petitioner is, merely limited to the effect that a civil suit No.666/2001 was decided way back on 22.10.2009 and he is unable to inspect record thereof. He submits that appeal i.e. RCA No.2/2008 was also filed against such judgment but even such appeal has also been decided. However, despite his best efforts, the record of the abovesaid civil suit is still not available. 2. It seems that the record in question is missing and as per one communication dated 28.04.2025 sent to the learned counsel for the petitioner by the concerned Vigilance Branch, a fact-finding inquiry is already underway and the missing record is being re-constructed. 3. Such enquiry and re-construction has already been assigned to the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CM(M) 833/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:06.05.2025 16:42:14 Court of Mr. Sahil Gupta, learned Civil Judge, Central, Tis Hazari Courts. 4. Since the record is missing and the re-construction is underway, naturally, there is no possibility of providing the petitioner with the record for inspection purposes. 5. The petition is disposed with direction to the concerned fact-finding inquiry authority to conclude such enquiry and re-construction of record as expeditiously as possible. As and when such re-constr