JAI PRAKASH vs SMT. SOPNA RANI

Judgment text excerpt

$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 13th May, 2025 + CM(M) 881/2025 & CM APPL. 28437/2025 JAI PRAKASH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Jain and Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocates versus SMT. SOPNA RANI .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) CM APPL. 28437/2025 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 881/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner/judgment debtor submits that he has already e-filed the impugned order dated 28.04.2025 which indicates that warrants of attachment has been issued against the judgment debtor. He submits that decretal amount has been paid substantially and the balance outstanding is hardly Rs. 2,000/-. 2. After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for petitioner submits that he would place on record all the receipts before the learned Executing Court. He submits that he would move appropriate application in this regard before the learned Executing Court, seeking recall of warrants of attachment also. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CM(M) 881/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:14.05.2025 11:33:03 3. In view of the above and considering the fact that the substantial decretal amount has already been paid, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file any such application along with receipts seeking recall of warrants of attachment. 4. Let such application be filed within two working days and till then the warrants of attachment shall remain in abeyance. 5. However, it is clarified that it will be upto the learned Executing Court to consider any such application and the receipts and then to proceed further with the Execution Petition and to pass appropriate orders for the purpose of realizing the bala