Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-05-19

INDER RAJ SAHNI PROPRIETOR M/S SAHNI COSMETICS vs NEHA HERBALS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.

Citation / case number
C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM)-355/2021 2025:DHC:4037
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
INDER RAJ SAHNI PROPRIETOR M/S SAHNI COSMETICS
Respondent
NEHA HERBALS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on: 19th May, 2025 + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 355/2021 INDER RAJ SAHNI PROPRIETOR M/S SAHNI COSMETICS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. M.K. Miglani, Mr. Hardik Gogia and Mr. Akash Singh, Advocates. versus NEHA HERBALS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sachin Gupta, Mr. Adarsh Agarwal, Mr. Rohit Pradhan and Ms. Prashansa Singh, Advocates. + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 455/2022 INDER RAJ SAHNI M/S SAHNI COSMETICS, 4650, GALI MOHAR SINGH JAT, PAHARI DHIRAJ, DELHI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. M.K. Miglani, Mr. Hardik Gogia and Mr. Akash Singh, Advocates. versus VIKAS GUPTA, 5240, KOLHAPUR HOUSE, KAMLA NAGAR, DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sachin Gupta, Mr. Adarsh Agarwal, Mr. Rohit Pradhan and Ms. Prashansa Singh, Advocates. CS(COMM) 207/2023 VIKAS GUPTA AND ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Sachin Gupta, Mr. Adarsh Agarwal, Mr. Rohit Pradhan and Ms. Prashansa Singh, Advocates. 1. The present suit arises from competing claims over the use of trademark “NEHA”. What might otherwise be seen as a common Indian forename has, in this instance, become the focal point of a trademark dispute between two entities operating in the personal