GOURAV SAMSUKHA vs M/S RAJ PLASTIC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 16th May, 2025 CM(M) 1433/2023 & CM APPL. 45725/2023 GOURAV SAMSUKHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nikhil Malhotra and Ms. Poorna, Advocates. versus M/S RAJ PLASTIC .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ankit Tandan and Mr. Ram Kr. Soni, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Defendant has taken exception to order dated 24.08.2023 whereby his application moved under Order VII Rule 10 CPC has been dismissed. 2. Mr. Nikhil Malhotra, learned counsel for petitioner/defendant submits that the purchase order, in no uncertain terms, specifies that the disputes, if any, would be subject to Tirupur jurisdiction only and the plaintiff has filed the suit, merely, on the basis that his office is situated in Delhi. 3. According to him, no cause of action has taken place in Delhi. 4. This Court has seen impugned order dated 24.08.2023. It seems that the application has been disposed of, merely, for the reason that the issue of jurisdiction has already been framed by the Court and, that, therefore, such aspect would be considered, after completion of recording of evidence of the parties. 5. Any such application mo