DR RITA BAKSHI vs SEEMA BAJAJ

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 26th May, 2025 CM(M) 828/2025 & CM APPL. 26980-26981/2025 DR RITA BAKSHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Mr. Bharat Malhotra and Mr. Kushal Malhotra, Advocates versus SEEMA BAJAJ .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raajan Chawla, Ms. Manika Jolly and Ms. Pallavi Yadav, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner has filed a suit seeking recovery. 2. Petitioner is a practising doctor and so is the respondent. 3. During pendency of the suit in question, petitioner choose to examine herself through her attorney and, vide order dated 25.04.2025, noticing that plaintiff has already been granted sufficient indulgence to lead her evidence, such request was disallowed while also observing that even Special Power of Attorney, allegedly executed in favour of such attorney, was unstamped. 4. It needs to be mentioned that when this matter was taken up by this Court on 05.05.2025, Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, submitted that plaintiff herself would enter into witness box and, therefore, notice was issued to respondent. 5. Learned counsel for responden