DILIP RAWAL vs M/S MOTHERS PRIDE EDUCATION PERSONNA PVT LTD & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 15.05.2025 + C.R.P. 354/2024 & CM APPL. 69702-69703/2024 DILIP RAWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Narang, Mr. Vivek Kr. Gaurav, Mr. Umesh Bishnoi & Mr. Kartik Srivastava, Advocates. versus M/S MOTHERS PRIDE EDUCATION PERSONNA PVT LTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) CM APPL. 69702/2024 & CM APPL. 69703/2024 [Condonation of delay] 1. These are Applications filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking condonation of delay of 1 day in filing and 35 days in re-filing the present Petition respectively. 2. For the reasons as stated in the Application, the delay is condoned. 3. The Application stands disposed of. C.R.P. 354/2024 4. The present Petition seeks to challenge an interlocutory order dated 16.04.2024 passed by learned District Judge, Commercial Courts-01, South- West District, Dwarka Courts, Delhi in Misc. ADJ No.155/2024 in CS(Comm) 158/2019 captioned Dilip Rawal v. M/s. Mothers Pride & Ors. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:JAI NARAYAN Signing Date:18.05.2025 C.R.P. 354/2024 Page 1 of 3 11:21:48 5. The attention of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner is drawn to the provisions of Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 [hereinafter referred to as the “CC Act”], wherein it is stated that no civil revision petition shall be entertained against any interlocutory order. It is apposite to set out Section 8 of the CC Act below: “8. Bar against revision application or petition against an interlocutory order.—Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, no civil revision application or petition shall be entertained against any interlocutory order of a Commercial Court, inc