DILIP KUMAR JHA AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~85 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 21.05.2025 + CRL.M.C. 3245/2025 & CRL.M.A. 14298/2025 DILIP KUMAR JHA AND ANOTHER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar and Ms. Kiran, Advocates. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Pardeep Kumar, PS Ghazipur. Ms. Nidhi Dubey, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 93/2021 of PS Ghazipur for offence under Section 323/354B/506/34 IPC. It is submitted that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2 herein) has settled all disputes with the petitioners. Learned counsel for petitioners has taken me through order dated 01.03.2025 of the learned Trial Magistrate whereby after detailed discussion, it was held that no offence under Section 354B IPC is made out, so the petitioners were discharged of the said offence. The learned Trial Magistrate directed framing of charges against the petitioners for offence CRL.M.C. 3245/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages Signature Not Verified GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally Signed KATHPALIA Date: 2025.05.21 16:58:15 +05'30' By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:21.05.2025 19:19:12 under Section 498A/323/34 IPC. Today, both petitioners have appeared in person while respondent no.2 has appeared through videoconferencing. 2. I have spoken with the parties in Hindi. 3. It is submitted by respondent no.2 that she has compromised all disputes with the petitioners. It is further submitted by her that after dissolution of her marriage with petitioner no.1, she has got remarried. As decided by parties, custody of son of petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 shall continue with respondent no.2 and there shall be no visitation rights with petitioner no.1.