DEEPAK vs STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. & ORS. & ORS. & ORS. & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 09.05.2025 + CRL.M.C. 2582/2025 DEEPAK .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Rachna Jasaiwal & Ms. Apurva Singhal, Advs. with petitioner in person. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State. SI Priyanka PS Alipur. Mr. Akshay Kumar & Mr. Sanjeev Solanki, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR SHALINDER KAUR, J (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 11557/2025(Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 2582/2025 3. The present petitioner has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the FIR bearing No. 813/ 2014 dated 02.09.2014 for offences Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Crl.M.C. 2582/2025 Page 1 of 4 By:NEELAM Signing Date:21.05.2025 19:54:12 under Sections 354A/323/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Alipur (subject FIR). 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an altercation between the petitioner and respondent no. 2, due to quarrel over the grazing of cattle in the field of the respondent no. 2, led to the registration of the subject FIR, however, the parties have arrived at a Settlement, thereby, amicably resolving the dispute persisting between them. 5. The present petition is premised on the aforesaid assertion that the dispute inter se the parties stand amicably resolved, of their own volition, uninfluenced by any coercion, compulsion or undue inducement. In furtherance thereof, a Compromise Deed dated 22.01.2024, has been duly executed between the petitioner and respondent No. 2. It is further submitted that, in terms of the said Compromise Deed, the r